PTI’s Panjhuta slams verdicts without evidence, calls SC directive unrealistic

ISLAMABAD: Leader of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) and legal expert Naeem Panjhuta has criticized the judicial process, stating that verdicts are being passed solely on allegations without CCTV footage or substantial evidence.

Speaking at ABN News Program “Badlo,” Panjhuta has said that judges who stand for truth and justice often face pressure, forced transfers, or other forms of hardship.

Panjhuta expressed concern over the Lahore High Court’s decision to deny bail merely due to lack of cooperation in investigations, pointing out that punishments are being handed down in cases where no concrete evidence exists. He emphasized that the PTI founder has never backed away from his stance and has cooperated at every legal forum, yet courts are delivering verdicts based purely on accusations without visual proof.

PTI leader also referred to the Supreme Court’s recent directive to resolve 10,000 terrorism-related cases within four months, calling it unrealistic. “Even in four years, it would be difficult to conclude such a high number of cases with so many witnesses involved,” he remarked. Panjhuta added that those supporting democracy are being punished, while those who withdraw are seemingly receiving protection.

During the same program, PML-N leader Ali Gohar Baloch welcomed the government’s introduction of a digital system but stressed that a full inquiry into overbilling must be conducted and those responsible held accountable. He stated that individuals involved in the May 9 incidents are terrorists regardless of their political affiliations, and if anti-terrorism courts are delivering sentences, it reflects the rule of law. He also called for legal action against those who issue threats to women at public gatherings.

PPP leader Nadir Khan Gabol, participating in the discussion, praised the current finance minister as more capable than previous ones, with a strong understanding of both economics and finance. He said if the Auditor General’s reports contain evidence, thorough investigations should follow. Gabol stressed the importance of reducing the financial burden on the public through petroleum levy savings, especially for motorcyclists and rickshaw drivers.

Nadir Khan Gabol also raised concerns over sugar exports, questioning whether the Prime Minister’s family benefitted from the move. He highlighted a potential conflict of interest, stating that the Cane Commissioner had recommended against the export of sugar, yet permission was granted, which led to increased prices and public hardship. He called the situation a clear example of misgovernance and demanded a full investigation into why exports were allowed despite official warnings.