AJK govt rejects JAAC’s protest politics, warns against attempts to disrupt elections

MUAFFARABAD: The Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) government has strongly criticized the Joint Awami Action Committee (JAAC), accusing it of spreading a misleading and baseless narrative under the guise of public issues.

According to government officials, the facts surrounding the ongoing dispute have become clear to the public, while the political leadership and opposition parties of AJK appear united against what they describe as JAAC’s rigid stance and protest-driven politics.

The government maintained that it pursued negotiations, relief measures, and implementation of public demands, whereas JAAC continued to rely on pressure tactics and street protests. Officials argued that the committee’s insistence on demonstrations despite the acceptance of 35 out of its 38 demands reflects political stubbornness rather than a genuine commitment to public welfare.

The government also highlighted the ratification of the All Parties Conference declaration by the AJK Legislative Assembly, calling it a clear demonstration of democratic consensus. It stressed that the Assembly remains the highest representative institution in the region and that its decisions cannot be undermined through street pressure.

Officials stated that while peaceful protest is a democratic right, activities such as blocking roads, disrupting public life, and taking the law into one’s own hands would not be tolerated. They warned that any attempt to disturb peace and order would be dealt with according to the law.

The government urged citizens to place their trust in democratic institutions, constitutional processes, and dialogue rather than strikes, shutdowns, and pressure tactics. It also alleged that efforts to obstruct the electoral process scheduled for June 9 were aimed at influencing the democratic process rather than protecting public rights.

Reaffirming its commitment to stability, the government said Azad Kashmir requires dialogue, practical solutions, and peaceful engagement rather than continuous protests. It added that there should be no compromise on peace and stability and that any attempt to hold public life hostage would be addressed within the framework of the law.